Google AI Mode — be early and increase revenue

Google AI Mode for e-commerce — grow revenue with real-time data and consistent product information.

Google AI Mode, without the fuss

Google is moving more of the buying journey into the search results. In AI Mode, Google summarizes options, compares attributes, and weighs price and stock in near real time. The decision is often formed in the search view—before a click to your site. If your product data isn’t correct, complete, and consistent between the Merchant Center feed, product detail pages (PDP), and structured data, your products won’t be selected. That’s true regardless of how much you spend on ads or how sharp your copy is.

For companies selling both B2B and B2C, this is more than a technical detail. You handle public consumer prices, promotions, and delivery promises—while also running net pricing, volume steps (MOQ), selling units (e.g., 6-packs), contract terms, and sometimes entirely different attribute requirements in B2B. AI Mode won’t tolerate a public feed price that differs from the page price, and it won’t “understand” incomplete items. Consistency and real time are hygiene, not “nice-to-have.”

This article explains what actually changes, how revenue is affected, how to design a simple but robust architecture, what commonly trips up B2B/B2C merchants—and a concrete revenue example you can adjust with your own numbers. The goal is action and measurable revenue impact, not only “better prerequisites” or soft values.

What Google AI Mode means in practice

Traditional search has optimized for clicks to your site where the persuasion happens. In AI Mode, more of the filtering happens in the results themselves. The model draws on the Shopping Graph, Merchant Center, your structured data (schema.org/Product), and PDP content. The rule is simple: Google elevates what’s reliable and legible and ignores what looks uncertain or contradictory. Reliability rests on three things:

Coverage. Products must be well described: identifiers (GTIN/MPN), brand, description, images, and category-relevant attributes. Missing key fields lowers relevance.
Consistency. Feed price and stock must match the page and your structured data. Mismatch leads to downgrades or rejection.
Freshness/latency. When price, stock, or promotion changes, it must show up immediately. Slow batch flows often display the wrong message in the AI surface exactly when demand peaks.

B2B/B2C merchants often fail on #2. It’s enough that the public price in the feed flips to a promo while the PDP stays at regular price, or that the feed says “in stock” while the page says “out of stock, 5–7 days.” Those gaps are easy to create with manual processes and hard to fix afterwards. You need to eliminate them in your architecture, not in your marketing.

Why moving early is a revenue question — not an “SEO initiative”

Acting early has three direct revenue effects.

First, more approved and eligible products become visible. Many accounts carry a high share of rejections for trivial reasons: missing identifiers, wrong categories, inconsistent prices, or missed product flags. Closing these gaps unlocks visibility without buying more traffic.

Second, fewer abandoned purchases and returns. When price, stock, and delivery promise are the same across sources, you reduce the friction that otherwise creates cancellations, support cases, and returns tied to wrong information. That effect shows up quickly in orders, independent of ad budget.

Third, real-time updates make promotions and stock events count when they happen. If you cut price at 09:15 and that shows in the AI result at 09:16, you capture the demand that exists right then. If the change sits in a nightly batch, you lose hours—and hours matter in campaign periods.

Here’s the core: revenue shifts toward the players whose data can be trusted now. The one who fixes this first becomes the “default choice” in more journeys and holds that position while competitors lag.

Revenue example (per month)

Take a concrete, conservative example. You have 50,000 SKUs in Merchant Center. Today 8% are rejected or downgraded due to data issues. With basic data quality and real-time flows you bring that down to ~2%. That means ~3,000 more products approved and actually shown.

Assume each newly approved SKU gets 200 impressions per month in Google’s shopping/AI surfaces. If 1.5% of impressions lead to clicks (CTR) and 2.2% of clicks lead to orders, with an AOV of SEK 1,200, those newly shown products generate ~198 extra orders/month ≈ SEK 237,600 in added revenue.

Continue with order quality. Say you do ~6,000 orders/month. Right now, 1.5% are cancelled due to price or stock discrepancies somewhere in the chain. If better consistency lowers this to 0.5%, you keep about 60 orders that would otherwise have fallen out—≈ SEK 72,000 at the same AOV.

Finally, when campaigns and stock changes propagate immediately rather than after a batch, we often see a modest but steady +2% GMV effect during periods with many price/stock changes. If you do SEK 10M/month, that’s another SEK 200,000.

Summed, this example yields roughly SEK 509,600 in extra monthly revenue—without buying more traffic. Swap the numbers for your own; the point is the method and the drivers. The three levers (more approved products, fewer drop-offs, real time for promo/stock) are what most directly influence AI visibility and order inflow.

A simple architecture that holds up in the AI era

You don’t need to tear everything down. You need an event-driven integration hub that feeds both the web and Google from the same sources—and stops bad data before it reaches customers. Think like this:

One source of truth per fact. Price and promo rules come from pricing/ERP; stock and ETA from WMS/ERP; attributes and categorization from PIM. Avoid spreadsheets as middle layers—they create divergence. When price, stock, or promo changes, publish the change directly to Merchant Center and update your PDP at the same time, including schema.org/Product.
This isn’t advanced magic; it’s ordinary events (“price changed,” “stock changed,” “campaign starts/ends”) that trigger small, quick updates.
Add validation in the flow. Run simple checks before publishing: does the feed price match the page? Is stock and selling unit present? Are mandatory category attributes filled? If something’s missing, block publishing with a clear error. “Stop-the-line” sounds dramatic, but in practice it saves revenue by preventing wrong information from being exposed. You’re not slowing the pace; you’re lowering the error rate.
Build in observability from day one. You need to know how long it takes from a change in source systems to a visible change in Merchant Center and on your PDP, how many items get rejected and why, and how often price/stock don’t match between sources. These are run-time KPIs, not reports “for someone else.” Put them on the wall screen and it becomes obvious where money leaks out.

B2B specifics that often sink the whole

Pricing logic is the most common trap. The public consumer price must be identical everywhere it appears. At the same time, net prices, volume discounts, and contract terms must be handled per customer or segment. You can absolutely combine both—but don’t let B2B conditions bleed into public flows, and don’t let the public price become inconsistent. The key is separating what’s public from what’s conditional, and ensuring both feed and PDP use the same public price.
Selling units & MOQ are another classic. In B2B you often sell 6-packs or full cartons. In B2C you sell singles. In AI Mode this becomes visible: if the feed implies single-pack but the PDP describes a 6-pack, the model treats your data as uncertain. The solution is to model the selling unit correctly (e.g., “SKU A / 6-pack”), show the correct per-unit price, and let this propagate consistently everywhere. That way you match the right demand queries, especially in B2B where buyers search on specific pack and price levels.
Technical attributes are underused. CE marks, IP ratings, compatibilities, standards, HS/TARIC codes—this isn’t just compliance; it’s searchability. Many B2B journeys start with a hard attribute requirement (“IP67-rated fixture, 10-pack, delivery within three days”). When those facts exist consistently in feed, PDP, and structured data, both qualification and conversion increase.

Multi-market and multi-channel without friction

Multiple markets mean different currencies, stock points, and often different languages. The basic principle is the same: one truth per fact area and event-driven publishing. Do currency conversion in the pricing system, not in ad-hoc feed scripts. Show stock in a way that reflects how you can actually fulfill per market, not a global “in stock” that then breaks in checkout. Tie translations to product attributes so structured data mirrors the correct language.

This sounds obvious, but you gain a lot by taking a couple of days to retire the “temporary” special cases created before a launch that then stuck around.

Make the work measurable — without drowning in dashboards

You can keep measurement straight without building a new BI platform. Focus on four signals that correlate with revenue:

Share of approved SKUs in Merchant Center shows how much of the catalog even gets to participate in the AI surface. When the share rises, your chance to be shown increases.
Cross-source consistency can be measured with a simple check: how many products have the same price and stock in the feed, on the page, and in structured data? The goal is to push mismatch toward zero.
Latency T90 (time for 90% of updates) from source systems to visible change in feed and on PDP tells you if you’re actually “real time.” In peak, this can be the difference between profiting from a campaign and explaining to management why it “didn’t land.”
Order quality captures how much loss stems from wrong information. Fewer cancellations and returns tied to wrong price/stock is a linear revenue improvement.

You don’t need more KPIs than these initially. When the four move the right way, you’ll see it in the order book.

Examples from two industries

Fashion brand with both D2C and resellers. Much of the gain lies in avoiding divergence when campaigns roll out quickly. When a price flips at 09:00, it must be the same in the feed, on the PDP, and in structured data within minutes—and stock must match everywhere. When that works, the AI response is more comfortable citing you. That gets you into recommendations during the hours the campaign actually applies.
At the same time you can keep B2B net pricing and volume discounts without leaking into public flows. The effect is fewer failed purchases and more categories becoming visible, especially variants (sizes/colors) that previously fell between chairs.
Industrial supplier with technical B2B demands and simpler B2C on selected items. The key is making technical attributes searchable: IP rating, standards, compatibility, mounting method, pack size. When those details exist consistently in feed, PDP, and structured data, you become a reasonable answer to “hammer drill with SDS-Max, 6-pack chisels, 48-hour delivery.” And when the same SKU is also sold as a single in B2C, both offers can coexist without conflict—each with a clear selling unit and correct price.

This reduces wrong orders, but above all it means you even qualify for the AI answer in scenarios where competitors’ data is too thin.

Work with process instead of heroics

This becomes stable when you connect the tech to a few simple ways of working.

At product launch, add a checkpoint: are all mandatory attributes present in PIM, is the category correct, do image requirements hold, are GTIN/MPN correct, is the selling unit right? When PIM signals “ready,” publishing is triggered and schema.org markup is added to the PDP without manual middle steps.

At price change, the pricing system must be the only source that changes price. Feed and page follow. If there’s a hard-coded price text somewhere in the templates, that’s a debt item that must go; otherwise divergence returns every campaign.

At stock events, update both Merchant Center and the PDP. If you run multiple stock points per market, decide how you want to present that publicly (e.g., an aggregated availability and a nuanced ETA text). Whatever your strategy, it must be consistent across all sources.

On error, you should get an alert to the right person with a clear message (“SKU 123 missing GTIN; publishing blocked”). Fix the error in the source system, not by “masking it” in the feed. That’s the only way to really prevent relapses.

Common misconceptions

“SEO will fix this.” SEO helps you write clearer text and structure pages. But if price, stock, and attributes aren’t consistent between feed, PDP, and schema.org, AI Mode won’t want to use your data. That’s why you start with integration and the data model.
“We’ll add real time later.” You’ll keep missing the high-impact hours during campaigns, sales, and relaunches. Replace nightly batch with events where it matters most: price, stock, campaign start and end. You can do this without touching the entire platform.
Over-reliance on feed tools. They’re excellent for mapping and channel control, but they cannot create true consistency if the sources disagree. The tool reflects what you feed it. Polish the sources; use the tool for fine-tuning.

A straightforward implementation path that won’t topple the organization

Start with an inventory. Where do price, stock, and attributes come from today? Where do mismatches occur? Which SKU groups matter most (category, brand, season)? Also map how quickly changes make it to the feed and the PDP. This is a week of focused work.

Move on to consistency and events. Re-route the parts that handle price/stock/promo so they publish on events—first in a priority category where volume is high and the risk appetite is sensible. Add checks that block publishing when requirements aren’t met. The goal is that within a few weeks you have a pilot that already yields fewer rejections, fewer cancellations, and faster campaign exposure.

Then scale category by category. When the pattern works, repeat it where it gives the most effect. Meanwhile, establish a simple weekly rhythm with three short questions: what’s the share of approved products, how many mismatches do we have, what does latency look like? Everything else is fine-tuning.

Legal and trust — get it right from the start

You don’t need to overwork the legal side, but two things must be in place. First, personal data must be handled correctly under GDPR. Product data and price/stock are generally not personal data, but the connections between systems can sometimes carry traces of metadata that are. Ensure the integration handles authentication and logging in a way that doesn’t leak. Second, you must be able to show what happened when something went wrong.

Keep a simple, searchable log of events (“price changed,” “stock updated,” “publishing blocked” with reason). It gives faster troubleshooting and strengthens trust internally.

The management conversation — talk revenue, not tool preferences

Avoid getting stuck in discussions about tools and platforms. Instead, show how revenue moves when the four signals improve: more approved SKUs, lower mismatch, shorter latency, and fewer cancellations. Use your own math with your catalog and your AOV. Show month to month. When revenue increases because of better data quality, you’ll have the backing for the next step (e.g., attribute build-out in more categories).

Support, return rate and reviews — secondary effects that still count

When price and stock are correct, cancellations don’t just drop. Customers perceive the information as trustworthy, which affects both NPS and the willingness to leave positive reviews. On the B2B side this is more subtle but just as important: when resellers don’t have to call about discrepancies and can trust that technical product data is truly correct, the likelihood increases that your products stay in their own catalog and that they prioritize you in purchasing.

This is harder to measure short-term, but you’ll notice it in fewer tickets and smoother flows.

Summary — and a single list to bring to your next meeting

AI Mode rewards merchants who treat product data as infrastructure. For B2B/B2C the order of work is simple: build consistency, run real time where it matters, and make sure attributes are complete. The rest are details. If you want a quick recap to bring into the steering group, it’s this:

Make products eligible: raise the share of approved items by closing attribute gaps and stop publishing mismatches.
Shorten time to reality: replace batch with events for price, stock, and promotions so the AI surface mirrors reality in the same minute.
Keep B2B and B2C separate — but public flows consistent: correct selling units, correct price, correct attributes; public data must be identical everywhere.
Measure where the money moves: share of approved SKUs, mismatch frequency, latency, and order quality. Tie the improvements to revenue every month.

Do this now, before competitors have cleaned up their data flows, and you unlock visibility that is hard to take from you. The effect doesn’t just appear in charts—it appears in the order book. And it comes from something as unsexy as correct, consistent, and current product data. That’s exactly why it’s hard to copy once you’ve built a lead.

Key terms (buzzwords and explanations)

Google AI Mode — Google’s AI-based search mode that moves the buying journey into the results. AI summarizes options and compares attributes and price in real time. The decision often happens before the user even clicks through.
Shopping Graph — Google’s “database” of products, attributes, prices, and relationships. AI Mode draws facts from here to compare and present products.
Merchant Center — Google’s platform for your product feeds (price, stock, attributes). If data isn’t complete or consistent, products risk rejection or downgrades.
PDP (Product Detail Page) — The product page on your own site. Must show the exact same price, stock, and attributes as the feed and structured data—otherwise you won’t qualify for the AI answer.
Structured data (schema.org/Product) — Markup in the source code that makes product facts machine-readable: price, stock, GTIN, color, size, etc. Without it, the product becomes invisible or misunderstood.
SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) — Unique identifier for each product variant. Wrong or rejected SKUs mean directly lost visibility and revenue.
GTIN/MPN — Standardized product IDs Google uses to compare products. Missing these increases rejection risk.
MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) — Minimum purchase volume in B2B. Must be correct (e.g., 6-pack instead of single), otherwise the product is downgraded.
Event-driven architecture — Integration where price, stock, and promo changes are sent as events in real time. Makes the AI surface mirror reality immediately instead of lagging behind in batch flows.
Queueing — Ensures events are delivered and processed even during incidents. Prevents lost updates and smooths traffic spikes.
Fanin/Fanout — A pattern for distributing the same event to multiple systems. Example: a price change goes to Merchant Center, PDP, and warehouse integration simultaneously.
Serverless Functions — Code that runs automatically on events, without you operating servers. Example: update a feed or validate a product.
API Gateway — A secure front that exposes your APIs to Google and other receivers. Manages authentication, protection, and traffic.
Idempotency — Integration safety: the same change must not cause double effect. If “price changed” is sent twice, it should only apply once.
Stop-the-line — The principle of stopping errors before they reach customers. If the feed price doesn’t match the product page, publishing is blocked until fixed.
Latency T90 — A measure of how quickly 90% of updates propagate through the chain. Low latency is crucial for the AI surface to show correct price/stock in real time.
Observability — The ability to understand system state via logs, traces, and metrics. Important for seeing why products are rejected or where mismatches occur.
Data governance — Rules and ownership around who owns which data. Who sets price, who is responsible for attributes, who approves new products? Governance makes quality sustainable.
Trust capital — Trust built over time. If your data is consistently correct, Google “learns” to rely on you. Hard for competitors to catch up.
Fill rate — How often you can deliver as promised. High fill rate reduces returns and support tickets—and strengthens relationships in both B2B and B2C.
Revenue per exposed SKU — A KPI showing how much revenue each shown product actually contributes. Helps you prioritize the right categories.
Punchout/EDI — Standards for B2B orders directly from the customer’s systems. Must be kept in sync with public price and stock flows to avoid double truths.

More blogs